There are some myths in the world of NLP and coaching that can not be ignored. Among them, the Olympus of crap is the ban on the question "Why?" Why? Apparently, in front of a limiting belief, the use of such a question on the reinforcing effect that leads to belief and subject to seek experiences that confirm this belief.
Surely, the same as advocating the use of powerful questions. " Not yet know the exact etymology of the word, but it seems that once served as someone to get results ...
Ask questions about why the beliefs not only leads the individual to search for past experiences, but also can give us the key silológica (the logical premises that sustain) the belief that this makes sense in your head.
In fact, it is much more powerful influence silológica chain that sustains the belief that on the same belief as the belief that the end is connected to an emotional state that makes them difficult to disable or weaken it.
Moreover, it may be that the individual has no prior chain, which facilitates further contrargumentación because the will need to create at that time (at best) to make sense.
Not considering that the basis of changes in conversational Richard Bandler, are argumentative chains that rely on detecting the assumptions behind their beliefs or logical channels and then, find alternatives that can offer greater flexibility to the subject.
But you have to ask why for what's behind. The other option is envestir techniques sterile little more than a belief that gives meaning to that person's world and is desperately clinging questions or start shooting without rhyme or reason to any of the nail. This system seems to me, long, tiring and a scam for a client who is hoping to solve their problems while the coach or therapist is on duty to a client that provides money, now that is so necessary.
Conversational Changes to increase the accuracy of statements, saving time and money to the customer. Of course maybe this is not what interests the other hand .....
Surely, the same as advocating the use of powerful questions. " Not yet know the exact etymology of the word, but it seems that once served as someone to get results ...
Ask questions about why the beliefs not only leads the individual to search for past experiences, but also can give us the key silológica (the logical premises that sustain) the belief that this makes sense in your head.
In fact, it is much more powerful influence silológica chain that sustains the belief that on the same belief as the belief that the end is connected to an emotional state that makes them difficult to disable or weaken it.
Moreover, it may be that the individual has no prior chain, which facilitates further contrargumentación because the will need to create at that time (at best) to make sense.
Not considering that the basis of changes in conversational Richard Bandler, are argumentative chains that rely on detecting the assumptions behind their beliefs or logical channels and then, find alternatives that can offer greater flexibility to the subject.
But you have to ask why for what's behind. The other option is envestir techniques sterile little more than a belief that gives meaning to that person's world and is desperately clinging questions or start shooting without rhyme or reason to any of the nail. This system seems to me, long, tiring and a scam for a client who is hoping to solve their problems while the coach or therapist is on duty to a client that provides money, now that is so necessary.
Conversational Changes to increase the accuracy of statements, saving time and money to the customer. Of course maybe this is not what interests the other hand .....
.jpg)
Posts
